Friday, August 6, 2010

Small But Mighty

Have you ever fantasized about working with an Architect to design the home of your dreams?

Clete Kunce, of ONE 10 STUDIO, and I met recently with a couple who own a beautiful piece of property where they plan to build their next home. I’m enthusiastic about the prospects of their project. Their goals are sound and they’re really going about things the right way. They’ve done their research. They have a good idea what they want and what they need. They’ve decided what’s important to them. They’ve even found some plans in books and magazines that have elements that they like. That’s a great starting point.

We talked about all kinds of ways to make this the most sustainable, self-sufficient place they can. We talked about solar orientation, geothermal heating and cooling, Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs), Insulated Concrete Forms (ICFs), radiant heat and a host of other building systems. We covered issues like dust, mold, allergies and indoor air quality. They’re thinking about everything.

But something that really piqued my interest is that they want to build a small and modestly priced home. You may be thinking that this is fairly normal but it’s not. Especially at the scale that their talking. The size (and price) of the average American home has been increasing rapidly since the 1970’s. In fact, the Census Bureau most recently identified that average as over 2,400 square feet. The goal of the project that I’m talking about is to come in under 1,300 square feet. That’s an enormous difference.

Ok, that’s the setup. Then came the question … wait for it … “Why should I hire an Architect instead of a “designer” or just a builder for a small project like this?” That’s the punchline.

In all seriousness, it’s one of the most common questions that come up no matter the scale of the project. The obvious assumption is that it would be cheaper to have a “designer” draw up blueprints or pick a plan from a plan book or go to a builder who has a “designer” on staff.

I don’t know how many times over the years I’ve talked with someone who’s purchased one or more sets of plans out of the back of a magazine and now they’re looking for someone to take the very same plans and “tweak” them or combine them in some way. Where’s the sense in this process? You just spent $800 a piece for the full construction drawings of each design and now you’re willing to pay several hundred more to have everything changed to be just the way you want it. Congratulations, your cobbled-together-masterpiece has cost you a few thousand dollars. Wouldn’t your money be better spent starting at the beginning with someone who will design exactly what you want?

But I digress.

Back to our story. The goal is small, affordable, and efficient with a whole host of advanced concepts and alternative energy solutions; basically, small but mighty. Ironically, what may appear to be a small, simple exercise is actually a complicated little project. So my question is do you really want someone to just draw it up for you? Or do you want to engage someone that will fully integrate all of these concepts and systems throughout the design and deliver a successful project? That question is the answer.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Builders Aren't To Blame?

“But builders aren’t entirely to blame for this scenario. Antiquated zoning laws (and planning boards that uphold them) also play a part. When builders find themselves handcuffed to standard lot sizes, minimum square footage requirements, and high land costs, the tradeoff is often building to a lower specification to arrive at a pro forma that pencils. The solution ends up being a lumbering stock plan with a brick front, vinyl siding, and little to no side yard.” – Jenny Sullivan in “Is The McMansion Dead?” Builder Magazine - November 2009.

The title of the article caught my eye. “I sure hope so” was my immediate response. Obviously there’s much more to the article than this single paragraph. But it seems to me that this is an excellent example of where we’ve gone wrong. If more of us paid attention to the
Triple Bottom Line instead of just the Bottom Line, we wouldn’t have to suffer through statements like this one. Just do the right thing.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

You Don't Have A Clue!

Are you sure that you're comparing apples to apples? I'll be honest, it's not easy for contractors to put together bids for projects. If you're not working with an Architect's comprehensive plans and specifications, contractors have to make guesses and assumptions; provide allowances and alternates. In the end, that makes it very hard for you to know what you're getting.

I recently worked with a couple that was convinced that the two bids they were looking at were comparable. But were they? The first red flag was the $25k difference on the bottom line. So I took a look.

Neither company's quote was completely clear. Both had presented their scopes in seemingly exhaustive detail. But by digging a little deeper, I could see that one had included drawings and well defined allowances that amounted to a project that was roughly twice that of the other. In the end, the pricing from each of the contractors was fair and in line. The difference was that one had included a quality and scale of project that should command a much larger price tag.

And that's the key. If you don't have detailed plans and specifications; clear expectations, you won't have a clue.